Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 PROTECT Trial.

TitleAdjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of the Phase 3 PROTECT Trial.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuthorsMotzer RJ, Russo P, Haas N, Doehn C, Donskov F, Gross-Goupil M, Varlamov S, Kopyltsov E, Lee JLyun, Lim HYeong, Melichar B, Zemanova M, Rini B, Choueiri TK, Wood L, M Reaume N, Stenzl A, Chowdhury S, McDermott R, Michael A, Izquierdo M, Aimone P, Zhang H, Sternberg CN
Corporate AuthorsPROTECT study investigators
JournalEur Urol
Volume79
Issue3
Pagination334-338
Date Published2021 Mar
ISSN1873-7560
KeywordsCarcinoma, Renal Cell, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Indazoles, Kidney Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Nephrectomy, Pyrimidines, Sulfonamides
Abstract

Most studies indicate no benefit of adjuvant therapy with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PROTECT (NCT01235962) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to evaluate adjuvant pazopanib in patients with locally advanced RCC at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (pazopanib, n = 769; placebo, n = 769). The results of the primary analysis showed no difference in disease-free survival between pazopanib 600 mg and placebo. Here we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis (median follow-up: pazopanib, 76 mo, interquartile range [IQR] 66-84; placebo, 77 mo, IQR 69-85). There was no significant difference in OS between the pazopanib and placebo arms (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.26; nominal p > 0.9). OS was worse for patients with T4 disease compared to those with less advanced disease and was better for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m compared to those with lower BMI. OS was significantly better for patients who remained diseasefree at 2 yr after treatment compared with those who relapsed within 2 yr. These findings are consistent with the primary outcomes from PROTECT, indicating that adjuvant pazopanib does not confer a benefit in terms of OS for patients following resection of locally advanced RCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 PROTECT study, overall survival was similar for patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy who received adjuvant therapy with pazopanib or placebo. Pazopanib is not recommended as adjuvant therapy following resection of locally advanced RCC. This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01235962.

DOI10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.029
Alternate JournalEur Urol
PubMed ID33461782
PubMed Central IDPMC8407394
Grant ListP30 CA008748 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021