Englander Institute for Precision Medicine

Darolutamide in Japanese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Phase 3 ARASENS subgroup analysis.

TitleDarolutamide in Japanese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Phase 3 ARASENS subgroup analysis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsUemura M, Kikukawa H, Hashimoto Y, Uemura H, Mizokami A, Kato M, Matsushima H, Kosaka T, Nakamura M, Fukasawa S, Smith MR, Tombal B, Hussain M, Saad F, Fizazi K, Sternberg CN, E Crawford D, Kakiuchi H, Akiyama M, Li R, Kuss I, Joensuu H, Suzuki H
JournalCancer Med
Volume13
Issue21
Paginatione70029
Date Published2024 Nov
ISSN2045-7634
KeywordsAged, Aged, 80 and over, Androgen Antagonists, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Docetaxel, Double-Blind Method, East Asian People, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Pyrazoles, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the global ARASENS study (NCT02799602), darolutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel significantly reduced risk of death by 32.5% versus placebo plus ADT and docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.80; p < 0.0001), with a favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We investigated outcomes in Japanese participants.

METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo, plus ADT and docetaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS: The Japanese subgroup comprised 148 patients (darolutamide 63, placebo 85). In the Japanese versus overall population, more patients were aged ≥75 years (darolutamide/placebo 35%/22% vs. 16%/17%) and had body mass index <25 kg/m2 (78%/79% vs. 46%/43%), The ECOG performance status 0 (92%/88% vs. 72%/71%), de novo mHSPC (95%/97% vs. 86%/87%), and Gleason score ≥8 (94%/92% vs. 78%/79%). Median treatment duration was 43.3/15.4 months for darolutamide/placebo. The overall survival HR for darolutamide versus placebo was 0.91 (95% CI 0.50-1.64), despite 85% of patients in the placebo group receiving subsequent life-prolonging therapy. Darolutamide prolonged time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.17-0.55). Treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were generally similar between groups. Adverse events known to be associated with docetaxel (e.g., neutropenia) were more frequent in the Japanese versus overall population.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, efficacy outcomes showed positive trends for darolutamide plus ADT and docetaxel in Japanese patients with mHSPC, consistent with the overall population, despite higher risk factors. The combination was well tolerated, with no new safety signals in Japanese patients.

DOI10.1002/cam4.70029
Alternate JournalCancer Med
PubMed ID39527466
PubMed Central IDPMC11552649

Weill Cornell Medicine Englander Institute for Precision Medicine 413 E 69th Street
Belfer Research Building
New York, NY 10021