Title | A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Trial Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Delivered in 4 Versus 2 Weeks (SHORTER): Acute Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Patient-reported Outcomes at a Single Institution. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2025 |
Authors | Nagar H, Diven MA, Rippon B, Barbieri CE, Hu JC, Scherr DS, Yadav P, Tshering L, Chandrasekhar S, Wolfe S, Pennell R, Coonce M, Chen SLing, Formenti SC, Strong P, Davicioni E, Molina AM, Nanus DM, Nauseef JT, Sternberg CN, Zhou XK, Lei W, Osborne JR, Marciscano AE, Tagawa ST |
Journal | Eur Urol Oncol |
Date Published | 2025 Jun 09 |
ISSN | 2588-9311 |
Abstract | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Some patients undergoing prostatectomy develop biochemical recurrence or have persistently detectable prostate-specific antigen level. Salvage radiotherapy (RT), delivered over ≥4 wk, is a current standard of care. Our objective was to demonstrate that salvage RT delivered in a five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen does not significantly increase patient-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared with a 20-fraction regimen (HYPO). METHODS: In this randomized noninferiority study, 137 patients were randomized 1:1 to salvage RT with 32.5 Gy in five fractions or 55 Gy in 20 fractions. We report acute changes in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at 3 and 6 mo. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The difference in the changes in EPIC GU scores between SBRT and HYPO was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.53, 1.93), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. The difference in the changes in EPIC GI scores between SBRT and HYPO was 1.16 (95% CI, -5.15, 7.46), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Salvage RT delivered in five fractions was not associated with a significantly worse decline in patient-reported GU or GI toxicities at 3 or 6 mo. Further follow-up is necessary to monitor for potential differences in late toxicity and patient-reported outcomes. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.014 |
Alternate Journal | Eur Urol Oncol |
PubMed ID | 40494733 |