Title | Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a or Gene Alteration. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2020 |
Authors | Abida W, Patnaik A, Campbell D, Shapiro J, Bryce AH, McDermott R, Sautois B, Vogelzang NJ, Bambury RM, Voog E, Zhang J, Piulats JM, Ryan CJ, Merseburger AS, Daugaard G, Heidenreich A, Fizazi K, Higano CS, Krieger LE, Sternberg CN, Watkins SP, Despain D, Simmons AD, Loehr A, Dowson M, Golsorkhi T, Chowdhury S |
Corporate Authors | TRITON2 investigators |
Journal | J Clin Oncol |
Volume | 38 |
Issue | 32 |
Pagination | 3763-3772 |
Date Published | 2020 Nov 10 |
ISSN | 1527-7755 |
Keywords | Aged, Aged, 80 and over, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Indoles, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Progression-Free Survival, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant |
Abstract | PURPOSE: or () alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS: We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor-directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS: Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic alteration and for patients with a or alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types. |
DOI | 10.1200/JCO.20.01035 |
Alternate Journal | J Clin Oncol |
PubMed ID | 32795228 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC7655021 |
Grant List | P30 CA008748 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States P50 CA092629 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States P50 CA180995 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States |